Understanding Inland Revenue’s Final Guidance on Tax Loss Carry-Forward
Inland Revenue has recently published the final version of its interpretation statement, offering comprehensive guidance on the continuity of business activities for tax loss carry-forward. This article highlights the main changes and additional insights provided in the final statement, as well as addressing certain aspects not covered. We also explore how taxpayers are adapting to the new rules and provide recommendations for ensuring compliance.
Defining the Nature of Business Activities
The final statement emphasizes the importance of defining a company’s business activities when relying on the business continuity test (BCT). It offers general guidance on factors to consider, such as core processes, product or service type, significant assets, scale, and target markets.
Groups of Companies
For groups of New Zealand resident companies, the BCT treats them as a single entity in assessing changes to business activities. The final statement clarifies that intra-group activities and transactions are disregarded for BCT purposes. It also provides guidance on how major changes within a deemed single company or changes in the relative importance of products/services are evaluated.
Major Changes Occurring Mid-Year
The final statement provides guidance on handling major changes that occur part-way through an income year. It confirms that tax losses can still be carried forward and set off against income generated before the major change, as long as adequate financial statements exist for that period. This aligns with the treatment of shareholder continuity breaches.
Scale Reduction and Discontinuation of Products/Services
In certain circumstances, a reduction in output scale or the discontinuation of existing products/services may indicate a major change. The final statement includes examples to clarify when such changes qualify as major changes or permitted major changes. Permitted major changes encompass scale increase or changes in products/services using similar assets.
Examples Provided
The final statement includes various examples that cover a wide range of scenarios, such as ownership continuity breaches, major changes mid-year, determining business activities for deemed single companies, technological advancements, start-ups, and diversified groups disposing of businesses. These examples help illustrate the application of the rules in different contexts.
Unaddressed Matters
The final statement does not cover certain areas, including trade buyers’ integration after mergers, potential breaches of anti-avoidance rules, and the interaction of the BCT with tax consolidated group rules or amalgamation tax rules. Taxpayers should exercise caution in these areas and seek appropriate advice.
Taxpayers’ Response to the New Rules
Market practice regarding the treatment of tax losses in merger and acquisition transactions varies depending on individual circumstances and the purchaser’s plans for utilizing the losses. Seeking certainty through rulings and documenting positions taken are common approaches adopted by taxpayers to navigate the new rules effectively.
Conclusion and Expert Assistance
To fully understand and comply with the BCT rules and effectively utilize tax losses, it is crucial to engage with knowledgeable advisors. They can assist with conducting the necessary analysis, determining the need for binding or non-binding views, and documenting positions to ensure ongoing compliance. Contact your trusted advisor to discuss your specific situation and leverage their expertise in this area.
Your Outside Team
